← Search

Susan Devetski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Bend, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
198 matches · 126W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history198 matches
W
2026-10-25 · NIN SB Combo 8.5 W: SBRC George · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Goncharova
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-10-24 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W: SBRC Gerber · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Dilorenzo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-11 · NIN SB Combo 8.5 W: SBRC George · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Kempf
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W: SBRC Gerber · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Davida Kozlowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-08 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Leonard championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with KASHA WIDNER
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Christman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Anthony
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Striegel
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Kelly
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Moon
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Devetski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Moon
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
4.0
81.6%
62W–14L · 64.3% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
28W–21L · 53% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.2% of games
8.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.2% of games
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
40 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams