← Search

Sharon MacK

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Goshen, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 115W–76L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history191 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Cuson/Ramirez · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margie Witsken
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-5
L
2026-10-24 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W: SBRC Rush/Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nickole Grose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-10 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Cuson/Ramirez · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Connie Varga
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-03 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Cuson/Ramirez · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Zablocki
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-03 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W: SBRC Rush/Brown · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Weber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Dallavis/Zablocki · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Rhoades/Murphy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mia Martin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Dallavis/Zablocki · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Dallavis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC George/Brown · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Weber
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Dallavis/Zablocki · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Dallavis
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC George/Brown · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Striegel
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC George/Brown · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Striegel
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 50% of games
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.1% of games
3.5
56.6%
30W–23L · 50.5% of games
4.0
50%
13W–13L · 50% of games
6.5
75.4%
43W–14L · 61.3% of games
7.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert