← Search

Margie Witsken

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granger, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 108W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history192 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Cuson/Ramirez · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon MacK
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-5
W
Default
2026-10-07 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amanda Zablocki
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-16 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kerie Graham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · NIN SB 40&O 3.0 W: SBRC McCarthy/Witsken · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Oppman championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 W: SBRC Bona/Rink · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Brinker
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · NIN SB 18&O 3.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Witsken · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Oppman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 W: SBRC Bona/Rink · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Honor Adam
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · NIN SB 55&O 6.0 W: Witsken/McCarthy · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mitzi Holland
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · NIN SB 18&O 3.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Witsken · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Oppman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · NIN SB 40&O 3.0 W: SBRC McCarthy/Witsken · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Hickman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · NIN SB 18&O 3.0 W: SBRC Kelly/Witsken · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Kuzmic
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · NIN SB 40&O 3.0 W: SBRC McCarthy/Witsken · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Kuzmic
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.6%
64W–23L · 59.4% of games
3.5
29.4%
10W–24L · 43.1% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.4% of games
6.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.2% of games
6.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 47.3% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.8% of games
7.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe