← Search

Julie Dilorenzo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BRISTOL, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 78W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history152 matches
W
2026-10-31 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Weedman/George · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kayzie Weedman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-28 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Minatel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-10-24 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Weedman/George · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica George
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-24 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W: SBRC Gerber · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Devetski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-21 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Romanetz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-10 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 W: SBRC Weedman/George · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kayzie Weedman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-10-03 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W: SBRC Gerber · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adrienne Michaels
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-30 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Gerber/Graham · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Romanetz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-08 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 W: LP Lippert/Murphy · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judi Howard championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-21 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Weedman/Sojka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheena Zent
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 W: LP Lippert/Murphy · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Caravette
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Weedman/Sojka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Krempec
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
60%
21W–14L · 52.2% of games
4.0
35%
7W–13L · 47.5% of games
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.6% of games
7.0
70%
14W–6L · 56% of games
7.5
44.2%
19W–24L · 46.2% of games
8.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe