← Search

Julia Ramirez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rolling Prairie, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
207 matches · 135W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history207 matches
W
Default
2026-07-29 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Rhoades/Murphy · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 W: SBRC Bona/Rink · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Cook
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Rhoades/Murphy · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Cuson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 W: SBRC Bona/Rink · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Rink
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-27 · NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: Havlish · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Douhan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-02-21 · NIN SB MXD 40&O 7.0: Cuson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Roth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: Havlish · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Maleski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-02-07 · NIN SB MXD 40&O 7.0: Cuson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Pontius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-01-31 · NIN SB Weekend Combo 6.5W: SBRC Madias/Cuson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with MacKenzie Austgen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-01-31 · NIN SB Weekend Combo 7.5W: SBRC Gerber/Widner · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eileen Varga
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-01-30 · NIN SB MXD 18&O 7.0: Cuson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Cincoski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-30 · NIN SB MXD 18&O 6.0: Havlish · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Douhan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
73.1%
49W–18L · 62.2% of games
3.5
50%
19W–19L · 45.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.8% of games
6.5
75%
24W–8L · 61.7% of games
7.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
59 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams