← Search

Barry Pontius

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granger, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 96W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history134 matches
W
2026-10-30 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 M: SBRC Pontius · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joshua Derse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-10-25 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 M: SBRC Burfien · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Pierce
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-10-24 · NIN SB 18&O Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 M: Pontius · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michael Cincoski championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-23 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 M: SBRC Pontius · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Houghton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · NIN SB 18&O Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 M: Pontius · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michael Cincoski
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-09 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 M: SBRC Pontius · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kevin Kohlmeier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-02 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 M: SBRC Pontius · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marshall Grathwohl
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-19 · NIN SB MXD 18&O 7.0: Cuson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Dallavis mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-18 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 M: SBRC Pontius · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joshua Derse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-30 · NIN SB 18&O Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 M: Pontius · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicholas Catapano
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · NIN SB 18&O Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 M: Pontius · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Cincoski
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Qasim Asghar championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
78.8%
41W–11L · 61% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 40.5% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.6% of games
7.5
72%
18W–7L · 57.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
81.8%
18W–4L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
25 matches
Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams