← Search

Qasim Asghar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granger, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 65W–48L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history113 matches
W
2026-10-25 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 M: SBRC Burfien · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jalen Bayer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barry Pontius championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Pickering championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joerg Burfien
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Wolff
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cincoski
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barry Pontius
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Harker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Gogola
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-06 · NIN SB MXD 18&O 7.0: Striegel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Gadacz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
51.2%
44W–42L · 51.7% of games
7.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
24 matches
#1 Singles
19%
21 matches
#2 Singles
14%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams