← Search

John Nichols

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 83W–76L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history159 matches
L
2026-10-30 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Greg Salway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-25 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 7.0: White · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Hewes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Greg Salway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-17 · NIN FW Combo 75 M: WW White/French · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Stanchin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-09-26 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vijay Kamineni
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-26 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Peterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · NIN FW Combo 75 M: WW White/French · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Stanchin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cosimo Lombardi championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-18 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Sagan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-11 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dinesh Agnihotri
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Steve White
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-28 · NIN FW 65&O 8.0 M: FW Peterson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Rogers
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
72.7%
32W–12L · 58.5% of games
4.0
12%
3W–22L · 37.7% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 47.1% of games
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 59.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.2% of games
8.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 39.8% of games
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert