← Search

Joel Valcarcel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 75W–105L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history180 matches
W
2026-10-30 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW Rosales · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Roshan Kotian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-16 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW Rosales · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chuyen Le
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-18 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW Rosales · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chuyen Le
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW UdDowla/Le · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Heller
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW UdDowla/Le · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elmer Toliver
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW UdDowla/Le · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Tippmann
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: WW Sagan/Sutton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Kaufman championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Sagan/Valcarcel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Peterson
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: WW Sagan/Sutton · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Salway
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: WW Sagan/Valcarcel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryant Barger
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: WW Sagan/Sutton · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rex Peters
loading the estimate
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: WW Sagan/Valcarcel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Wemhoff
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
59.5%
25W–17L · 54.8% of games
3.5
21.2%
7W–26L · 39.4% of games
6.5
52%
13W–12L · 51% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 32.4% of games
6.0mixed
44.9%
22W–27L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
25.9%
7W–20L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
30 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert