← Search

Jason Sagan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 152W–92L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history244 matches
W
2026-10-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Peterson championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-30 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steve White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-30 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 6.0: White/Jakacki · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Valcarcel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-10-18 · NIN FW MXD 55&O 6.0: White/Jakacki · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Quillen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-16 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Barnes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-10 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steve White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-03 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Salway
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-10-02 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Barnes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
Default
2026-09-26 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Salway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-26 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steve White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-19 · NIN FW Combo 75 M: WW White/French · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derek French
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-09-18 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Nichols
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
80.6%
29W–7L · 61.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
20W–40L · 43.1% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 57.3% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 63.5% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
71.7%
43W–17L · 59% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
28W–14L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
59 matches
#1 Singles
12%
28 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams