← Search

Mark Rifkin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 60W–49L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history109 matches
W
2026-10-24 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW Weybright · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Timothy Weybright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Peterson championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-20 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Peterson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-19 · NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: White · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sea Grandon mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-22 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Peterson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Rifkin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Douglas Rounds
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-22 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: WW Sagan/Valcarcel · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Rifkin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Treesh
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: WW Sagan/Valcarcel · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-07 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Rifkin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adam Hackett
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-02 · NIN FW 18&O 3.0 M: WW Rifkin · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · NIN FW 18&O 3.5 M: WW Sagan/Valcarcel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Houser
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
58%
29W–21L · 54.7% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 34.8% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.4% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Singles
15%
16 matches
Singles
15%
16 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe