← Search

Chris Rodenbeck

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
9 matches · 5W–4L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history9 matches
L
2026-10-24 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW Rosales · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abner Mendador
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: Treesh/Scrogham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Hart
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · NIN FW 40&O 3.0 Men: Treesh/Scrogham · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with GEORGE JOHN
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Camy Rodenbeck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Camy Rodenbeck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Camy Rodenbeck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Camy Rodenbeck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Camy Rodenbeck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Camy Rodenbeck mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe