← Search

Aaron Striegel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granger, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 41W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history129 matches
L
2026-10-30 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 M: WW Rodriguez · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Frank Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-25 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 M: SBRC Striegel · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ronnie Coleman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-11 · NIN SB 18&O Tr-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 M: Striegel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kenneth Heckel
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-09 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 M: WW Rodriguez · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erik Rodriguez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-04 · NIN SB 18&O Tr-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 M: Striegel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gary Sanders
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · NIN SB 18&O Tr-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 M: Striegel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Noah Taulbee
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-18 · NIN SB Combo 6.5 M: WW Rodriguez · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · NIN SB 18&O Tr-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 M: Striegel · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gary Sanders
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Striegel/Desch · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Striegel/Desch · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: SBRC Striegel/Desch · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roger Brady
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Striegel/Desch · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hunter Striegel
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 42% of games
3.5
23.8%
15W–48L · 39% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.3% of games
7.5
0%
0W–10L · 32.2% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
51.6%
16W–15L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova