← Search

Jasmine Shim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granger, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 56W–21L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history77 matches
W
2026-10-28 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Rush/Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nickole Grose
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-14 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Rush/Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Weber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Rush/Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Weber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-23 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Rush/Brown · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Nisley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-16 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: SBRC Rush/Brown · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Weber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Brown · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Erekson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Epson championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 W: LP Lippert/Murphy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Brown championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-29 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: SBRC Rhoades/Murphy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Weber
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
Default
2026-06-25 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC George/Brown · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Striegel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Brown
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
Default
2026-06-22 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 W: LP Lippert/Murphy · #1 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 52% of games
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 80.3% of games
3.5
75%
15W–5L · 63.9% of games
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 70.3% of games
5.5
40%
4W–6L · 52.9% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
7.5
75%
18W–6L · 59.5% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe