← Search

Barbara Serwatka

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elkhart, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 72W–90L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history162 matches
L
2026-10-28 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: EL Lozier/Bond · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Sigsbee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-21 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: EL Lozier/Bond · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janice Kay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-14 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: EL Lozier/Bond · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Myers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-07 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: EL Lozier/Bond · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Sigsbee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-30 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: EL Lozier/Bond · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janice Kay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-23 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: EL Lozier/Bond · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Myers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-16 · NIN SB Combo 7.5 W Day: EL Lozier/Bond · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janice Kay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-22 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: EL Lozier · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Sigsbee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: EL Lozier · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darcy A Richardes
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-25 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Goncharova
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · NIN SB 18&O 4.0 W: SBRC Widner/Kelly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Leonard
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 W: EL Lozier · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Peterson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.5% of games
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 64.1% of games
4.0
42.9%
24W–32L · 50% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.4% of games
7.0
75%
12W–4L · 59.2% of games
7.5
46.2%
18W–21L · 49.3% of games
8.5
0%
0W–8L · 37.5% of games
8.0mixed
6.7%
1W–14L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
21 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova