← Search

Karen Brabender

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bargersville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 119W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history189 matches
W
2026-10-30 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Neal Burnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-16 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Neal Burnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Neal Burnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-19 · Indy CX 7.5 IRCE Golightly · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Neal Burnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sally Gardner
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Keaton · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Burton
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Fry
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Keller
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
Default
2026-06-24 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #1 Singles · 4.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · Indy A40 4.5W NCHS Fry · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Fry
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Keaton · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Burton
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Keaton · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marylu Kosiarek
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 57.3% of games
4.0
61.2%
60W–38L · 55.2% of games
4.5
37%
10W–17L · 45.9% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
5W–0L · 72.3% of games
8.0
87.9%
29W–4L · 61.6% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.6% of games
7.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Singles
9%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams