← Search

Lindsay Schroeder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 63W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history87 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Martin
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-10-06 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Somers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Sharp
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenni Dillon
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn Marando
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Sharp
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Sharp
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Sharp
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn Marando
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Ostrowski
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Sharp
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-21 · Indy A40 4.0W HawGCC Chop · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenni Dillon
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN IRCD Brown · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn Marando
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.6% of games
3.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 61.9% of games
4.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 55.5% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 74.2% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer