← Search

Ricardo Bravo

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 58W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history113 matches
W
2026-10-17 · Serve-ivors/Lewis-Wellbaum/AVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Faulk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · Serve-ivors/Lewis-Wellbaum/AVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabriela Vodanovic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-22 · SFV LLW AV Stormers/Guarin/El Cariso · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Warren Gibbons
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-5
L
2026-07-26 · SFV LLW AV Stormers/Guarin/El Cariso · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Warren Gibbons
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Gerleman, Garrett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Garrett Gerleman
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-12 · Gerleman, Garrett · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leigh O'Neal Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · Gerleman, Garrett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Britt Bieri
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · Gerleman, Garrett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leigh O'Neal Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Gerleman, Garrett · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Garrett Gerleman
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-01 · Gerleman, Garrett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trent Londquist
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · Gerleman, Garrett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Noiles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-22 · Gerleman, Garrett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trent Londquist
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.4% of games
3.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 56.9% of games
4.0
48%
24W–26L · 51.7% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.3% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
20 matches
Singles
11%
12 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams