← Search

Jaime Tovar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Canoga Park, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 146W–40L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history186 matches
W
2026-10-31 · The Rocky Balboas/Tovar/Balboa · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with TJ St Marie
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-10-17 · The Rocky Balboas/Tovar/Balboa · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Perez
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-27 · Smash & Dash/Lula/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Heum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-26 · The Rocky Balboas/Tovar/Balboa · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Ferguson
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-09-20 · The Rocky Balboas/Tovar/Balboa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sebastian HEINRICH
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · Smash & Dash/Lula/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mikaela Nagler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-13 · Trial and Error/Heum/El Cariso · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Heum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-12 · The Rocky Balboas/Tovar/Balboa · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikolas Daka
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · Full Metal Racquets/Tovar-Lula/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with TJ St Marie
loading the estimate
3-6
W
2026-08-21 · LA - Jaime Tovar · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · Full Metal Racquets/Tovar-Lula/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with TJ St Marie
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with TJ St Marie championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.3% of games
3.5
83.7%
41W–8L · 62.4% of games
4.0
83.1%
49W–10L · 61.9% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 56.1% of games
0.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 65.5% of games
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 65.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.1% of games
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#1 Singles
17%
31 matches
Singles
13%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer