← Search

Priscilla Chieng

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rosemead, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 91W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history146 matches
W
2026-10-31 · SGV Wild Cards-Tang-Arroyo High /SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colin Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-10-25 · SGV Wild Cards-Tang-Arroyo High /SU10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colin Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-27 · SGV Wild Cards-Tang-Arroyo High /SA10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colin Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-09-13 · Mixed Nuts/Hwang-Nichols/Fremont · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colin Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-13 · SGV Wild Cards-Tang-Arroyo High /SU10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colin Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · SGV Spring Gummies-Manley-Arroyo HS/ SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madeline Chang
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-31 · SGV Spring Gummies-Manley-Arroyo HS/ SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Chen
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · SGV Spring Gummies-Manley-Arroyo HS/ SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madeline Chang
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-10 · SGV Spring Gummies-Manley-Arroyo HS/ SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hairong Cusack
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-01 · LA - Back in Black · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colin Tang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-01-31 · LA - Back in Black · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colin Tang
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · LA - Back in Black · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colin Tang
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 35.8% of games
3.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 51.3% of games
4.0
9.5%
2W–19L · 32.5% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 72.9% of games
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 80.9% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 72.9% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
28W–8L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams