← Search

Stephen Kim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 68W–68L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history136 matches
W
2026-11-01 · LA - GFT Vanguard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Tumey
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-10-25 · Mixed Nuts/Hwang-Nichols/Fremont · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessie Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · LA - GFT Vanguard · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Chun
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · Mixed Nuts/Hwang-Nichols/Fremont · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margie Englis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-17 · Scholland Garros/Han-Im/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jae Lee
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-10 · Scholland Garros/Han-Im/Scholl · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with brian Lee
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-10 · LA - GFT Vanguard · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Seung
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-03 · Scholland Garros/Han-Im/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with brian Lee
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-26 · Scholland Garros/Han-Im/Scholl · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yeonhak Jung
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-12 · Scholland Garros Tri-Men/Im-Jung/Scholl · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jisoo Han
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · Scholland Garros/Han-Im/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jisoo Han
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-29 · LA - Mixed Nuts · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charmaine Felix-Meyer
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 54.5% of games
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.7% of games
3.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.3% of games
4.0
38.5%
20W–32L · 46.5% of games
7.0
50%
5W–5L · 53.2% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.1% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.2% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova