← Search

Elizabeth Ugalde

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Estes Park, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 15W–34L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history49 matches
W
2025-05-09 · LAC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARY WEISFOUT
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-05-05 · LAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Hilmas
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-02 · LAC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Grolnick
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-04-21 · LAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Harris
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-06-14 · LAC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Ellen Speights
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Kathy Carlson / Bettina Cosima Larrarte
2024-05-31 · LAC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Grolnick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-10 · LAC WHITE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARY WEISFOUT
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-03 · LAC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Dingwall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
L
2023-05-31 · FHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Hintz-Siegrist
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-26 · FHCC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Liotino
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2023-05-24 · FHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Hintz-Siegrist
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-05-23 · FHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Smallwood
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 43.2% of games
6.0
29%
9W–22L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova