← Search

Pam Smallwood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Longmont, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 25W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history69 matches
L
2026-06-05 · LAC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laura Wonnacott
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · LAC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christy Hilmas
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-22 · LAC RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Dingwall
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-01 · LAC RED · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patty Orban
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-06-13 · LAC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brenda Laartz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-06 · LAC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Ellen O'Rell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-16 · LAC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shirley Bullinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-05-09 · LAC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Ellen O'Rell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-08-29 · LAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shirley Bullinger
loading the estimate
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2023-08-16 · LAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Wonnacott
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-08-09 · LAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Kingsley
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-08-02 · LAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Ellen O'Rell
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
34.8%
16W–30L · 43.5% of games
6.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer