← Search

Brenda Laartz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Longmont, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 15W–39L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history54 matches
L
2025-06-13 · LAC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Smallwood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-06-06 · LAC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Grolnick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-14 · LAC WHITE · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shirley Bullinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-06-07 · LAC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Grolnick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-0
L
2024-05-24 · LAC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Finn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-07-19 · FHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Wonnacott
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-12 · FHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Wonnacott
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-07-05 · FHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Wonnacott
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-07-01 · FHCC · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kris Graham
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2022-06-22 · FHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Finn
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2022-06-15 · FHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Finn
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-14 · FHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shirley Bullinger
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
20%
6W–24L · 34.9% of games
6.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova