← Search

Anita Whitney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Frisco, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 41W–76L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history117 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Team 2 Kurinji Sathasivam X7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chia-Pin Hsu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-12 · Team 2 Kurinji Sathasivam X7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kurinji Sathasivam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-09 · McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Klosky
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-02 · McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Elwell
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-19 · McKinney/Mutter-Perales W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Klosky
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-03-24 · McKinney/Mutter W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Estela Zodrow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-10 · McKinney/Mutter W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Estela Zodrow
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-02-17 · McKinney/Mutter W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Menhart
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-24 · McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Newby
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2023-02-26 · McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Becker
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-02-20 · McKinney/Brown W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Guang-An Li
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2023-02-15 · McKinney/Brown W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irene Luna
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
36.5%
35W–61L · 44.8% of games
7.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams