← Search

Hannelore Fischer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Estero, FL
3.5A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
47 matches · 14W–33L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history47 matches
L
2024-03-13 · Lighthouse Bay - L.Boyd · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Broihan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
L
2024-02-21 · Lighthouse Bay - L.Boyd · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sophia Modi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-01-31 · Lighthouse Bay - L.Boyd · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginny Asgeirsson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-17 · Lighthouse Bay - L.Boyd · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginny Asgeirsson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-10 · Lighthouse Bay - L.Boyd · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Boyd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-12-02 · Sterling Oaks - Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Benike
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2022-11-30 · Sterling Oaks - Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tricia Blakeslee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2022-11-16 · Sterling Oaks - Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tricia Blakeslee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-11-09 · Sterling Oaks - Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Benike
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2022-11-02 · Sterling Oaks - Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Benike
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-10-26 · Sterling Oaks - Blakeslee · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Benike
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-02 · Sterling Oaks - P. Johnson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Benike
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
29.8%
14W–33L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova