← Search

Pam Perkins

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Petaluma, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 7W–37L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history44 matches
L
2024-04-09 · WEST COUNTY TA/RAGLE RANCH 65AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Jordan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-05 · WEST COUNTY TA/RAGLE RANCH 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Young
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-25 · WEST COUNTY TA/RAGLE RANCH 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Jordan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-03-24 · WEST COUNTY TA/RAGLE RANCH 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Liles
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-02-13 · WEST COUNTY TA/RAGLE RANCH 65AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Young
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-05-09 · MAGNOLIA/M PK 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Betsy Hofstadter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-14 · ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 65AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenifer Gill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-04-08 · MAGNOLIA/M PK 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenifer Gill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-10-09 · GALVIN PK CW7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Sobieraj
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-09-25 · GALVIN PK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Colleen Toller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-09-24 · GALVIN PK CW7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jody Tucker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2022-05-23 · ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Moran
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 34.9% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.6% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 34.3% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King