← Search

Melissa Lasky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Muir Beach, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 4W–20L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history24 matches
L
2024-04-09 · MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-08 · MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Walsh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-03-19 · MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Trent
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-1
L
2024-02-13 · MT TAM RC 65AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Shirley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-05-07 · MT TAM RC 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charlotte Maassen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2020-03-04 · MT TAM RC 40AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Walsh
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2020-02-08 · MT TAM RC 40AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Dolan
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2020-01-30 · MT TAM RC 40AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paulette Moe
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-01-25 · MT TAM RC 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paulette Moe
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2020-01-24 · MT TAM RC 40AW3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Dolan
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2020-01-15 · MT TAM RC 40AW3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Dolan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2019-11-17 · MT TAM RC CW7.5B · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Segura
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 43.3% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams