← Search

Lorraine Fazzolare

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Napa, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 16W–10L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history26 matches
W
2024-04-08 · SILVERADO CC 65AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trish Lyon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-04-03 · SILVERADO CC 65AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Sweeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-03-15 · SILVERADO CC 65AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Coursen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2023-04-13 · CRANE PK 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Sweeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-23 · CRANE PK 65AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrice Bennett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
W
2022-02-24 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Sweeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-02-21 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kramer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-24 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Sweeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2022-01-05 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Hanson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2021-07-15 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deniece Mailloux
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2021-06-25 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Sweeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-06-11 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Sweeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.7% of games
7.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe