← Search

David Bailey

Golden, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 78W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Bailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
W
2026-07-15 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rom van der Zee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-27 · MC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-09 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colin Wein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-02 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-06-25 · MC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-18 · MC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rom van der Zee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-04 · MC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-31 · MC BRONZE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
51.7%
30W–28L · 51.1% of games
8.0
78.8%
26W–7L · 57.7% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 57.7% of games
8.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 68.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer