← Search

Nancy Weltlich

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fairhope, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 17W–27L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history44 matches
L
2026-09-29 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kaye Whittenberger
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-08 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hurley
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-01 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lee Matzenger
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lee Matzenger
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · Fairhope-Johnson/Sandefur · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Haley Knapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Fairhope-Johnson/Sandefur · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Lee Matzenger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Fairhope-Johnson/Sandefur · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renita Myers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Fairhope-Johnson/Sandefur · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Fairhope-Johnson/Sandefur · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Haley Knapp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-05 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hurley
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-26 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lee Matzenger
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-12 · Fairhope - Sandefur/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hurley
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 47% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams