← Search

Teal Creel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fairhope, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 108W–55L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history163 matches
W
2026-10-15 · Lott Park - Wilson/Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regan Lawson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-14 · OB - Bradley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regan Lawson
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-29 · Lott Park - Miller/Wilson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Miller
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-24 · OB - Bradley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regan Lawson
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-22 · Lott Park - Miller/Wilson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regan Lawson
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · Lott Park - Miller/Wilson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regan Lawson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Lott Park - Miller/Wilson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regan Lawson
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Lott Park - Wilson/Miller · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adriane Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Lott Park - Wilson/Miller · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Mayfield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Lott Park - Wilson/Miller · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Adriane Green
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Lott Park - Miller/Wilson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Chappell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · Lott Park - Miller/Wilson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimmie Sprayberry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.5% of games
3.0
70.1%
47W–20L · 59.1% of games
3.5
63.2%
43W–25L · 52.4% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 56.4% of games
6.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
31 matches
#1 Singles
14%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
19 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova