← Search

Lois Finlay

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gainesville, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 61W–113L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history174 matches
L
2026-09-28 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Bell
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-13 · Harbour Point-Bell · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Bell
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-04 · Cherokee Bluff (Vanessa Bradley)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francis Hill
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-6
L
2025-11-20 · Cherokee Bluff (Vanessa Bradley)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kacie Collinsworth
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-13 · Cherokee Bluff (Vanessa Bradley)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Smosny
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-06 · Cherokee Bluff (Vanessa Bradley)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula O'Boyle
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2025-09-29 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Burke
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-02 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Burke
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-12 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jody Nieves
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2024-11-16 · NEGTA/Mary Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Burke
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-07-26 · Harbour Point-Pinkerton · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elcira Pinkerton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-12 · Harbour Point-Pinkerton · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Belknap
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
27.3%
9W–24L · 42.2% of games
4.0
35.2%
44W–81L · 44.4% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 43.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer