← Search

Jody Nieves

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SUGAR HILL, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 115W–122L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history237 matches
L
2026-01-14 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maxine Dennis
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-13 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn Davis
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-08 · Alberta Banks-Nieves · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Rabinowitz
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-06 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marin Gerulski
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-22 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maxine Dennis
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-22 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maxine Dennis
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-20 · NEGTA/Bill Gaynor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Coarsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-17 · Alberta Banks-Nieves · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Rabinowitz
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-11-15 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maxine Dennis
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-23 · NEGTA/Bill Gaynor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-20 · Alberta Banks-Nieves · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Rabinowitz
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-10-17 · NEGTA/Harriet Connolly · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harriet Connolly
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.6% of games
3.0
37.1%
13W–22L · 44.3% of games
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 64.1% of games
4.0
43.9%
36W–46L · 47.9% of games
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.4% of games
7.5
50%
9W–9L · 51% of games
4.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 55.9% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
26 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert