← Search

Marin Gerulski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cumming, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 62W–44L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history106 matches
L
2026-11-03 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Burke
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-26 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krista Tripp
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-12 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Volante
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-05 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Burke
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-21 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maxine Dennis
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elyssa Tompkins
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-31 · Central Park (Evangeline Pacleb)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maxine Dennis
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-18 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Burke
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Bell
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-04 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Volante
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.2% of games
3.0
41.9%
13W–18L · 51% of games
3.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 60% of games
4.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 51.1% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 81.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
14 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova