← Search

Denise Volante

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gainesville, GA
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 38W–37L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history75 matches
L
2026-10-12 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marin Gerulski
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-03 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Bell
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-04 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marin Gerulski
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-17 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Davis
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-05 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marin Gerulski
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-20 · Harbour Point-Bell · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Burke
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-11-30 · NEGTA/Mary Bell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Sexton mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-4
W
2023-11-09 · NEGTA/Mary Bell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Anthony mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-06-08 · NEGTA/Mary Bell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Volante mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2023-02-10 · Longwood Ball/Smith · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Bell
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 7-6
L
2023-01-27 · Longwood Ball/Smith · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Bell
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2022-12-03 · Longwood Ball/Smith · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Fuller
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 53.7% of games
3.0
0%
0W–8L · 32.2% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 41.3% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 60% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
20W–12L · 55.5% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King