← Search

Susan Sandack

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 30W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Sandack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Cottonwood Club-Barber/Kovacsovics · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Atwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · Cottonwood Club-Barber/Kovacsovics · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula Naatz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · Cottonwood Club-Barber/Kovacsovics · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Gelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · Cottonwood Club-Barber/Kovacsovics · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Heimuli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · Cottonwood Club-Barber/Kovacsovics · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Atwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-09-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-09-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Crystal Spackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Crystal Spackman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-25 · Cottonwood Club-Kovacsovics/Gelman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Heimuli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-06-18 · Cottonwood Club-Kovacsovics/Gelman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Heimuli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-06-11 · Cottonwood Club-Kovacsovics/Gelman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Magdalena Kovacsovics
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-04 · Cottonwood Club-Kovacsovics/Gelman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Atwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.2% of games
3.5
14.3%
4W–24L · 38.2% of games
6.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 44.4% of games
7.0
48.6%
18W–19L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal