← Search

Whitney Casper

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, SC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 8W–7L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history15 matches
L
2026-03-18 · LCTA40/Barwick/St Andrews · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael MacK
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-18 · LCTA40/Barwick/St Andrews · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael MacK
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Finneyfrock mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Hicks mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlene Koch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
Brandy Mcmahon / William McMahon
2024-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Dempsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Dempsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Murdock
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2024-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wil Barwick
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Cohen
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2020-03-09 · L18SH - St. Andrews Badgers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Gregg
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2020-02-10 · L18SH - St. Andrews Badgers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Gregg
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe