← Search

Erika Colbrunn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 113W–117L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history230 matches
L
2026-10-29 · LCTA18/Tunick/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Biggs
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/Tunick/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylvia Delsalto
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Tunick/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle MacKes
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-21 · LCTA39/Tunick/Park West · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yulia Misciagna
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-18 · LCTA18/Tunick/Park West · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Hara
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-07 · LCTA39/Tunick/Park West · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yulia Misciagna
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-09-23 · LCTA39/Tunick/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Hallman
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-01 · LCTA40/Tunick/Park West · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yulia Misciagna
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-26 · LCTA18/Tunick/Park West · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alise McCormack
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-25 · LCTA40/Tunick/Park West · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Hallman
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-19 · LCTA18/Tunick/Park West · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Harrison
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-18 · LCTA40/Tunick/Park West · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alise McCormack
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68.3%
41W–19L · 57.8% of games
3.5
37.7%
43W–71L · 46.2% of games
6.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 51.5% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 34.1% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
66 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova