← Search

Kimberleigh Booros

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
270 matches · 162W–108L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history270 matches
L
2026-10-29 · LCTA18/Eichelberger/Hamlin · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Moore
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carly Hara championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with MacKenzie Williams championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Default
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Eichelberger/Hamlin · #2 Singles · 3.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-21 · LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Steele
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-10-08 · LCTA18/Eichelberger/Hamlin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Heffling
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-07 · LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-10-01 · LCTA18/Eichelberger/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Moore
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-24 · LCTA18/Eichelberger/Hamlin · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-23 · LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Moore
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with MacKenzie Williams championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
76.9%
30W–9L · 62.6% of games
3.0
60.9%
53W–34L · 53.2% of games
3.5
40.4%
19W–28L · 45% of games
5.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.9% of games
6.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 55.5% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 53.1% of games
4.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.1% of games
6.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 74.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
52 matches
#2 Singles
7%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe