← Search

Kim ONeill

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
279 matches · 139W–140L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history279 matches
W
2026-10-31 · LCTA54/WIGGINS/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Clark
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-10-29 · LCTA18/ONeill/I’On · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Richardson
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caitlin Nevin championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caitlin Nevin championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Wallace championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Netter championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Leahy championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Netter championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-22 · LCTA54/WIGGINS/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Hinson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/ONeill/I’On · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Elliott
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-21 · LCTA39/WIGGINS/HAMLIN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Heffling
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
55.8%
101W–80L · 50.7% of games
4.0
21.4%
6W–22L · 36.6% of games
6.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 54.5% of games
7.5
45.7%
16W–19L · 51% of games
3.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.4% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
143 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer