← Search

Kristen Clark

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 109W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history180 matches
W
2026-10-31 · LCTA54/WIGGINS/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim ONeill
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Passman championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle MacKes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Passman championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle MacKes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-18 · LCTA39/Clark/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Buchan
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · LCTA54/WIGGINS/MPR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annmarie Taggio
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-27 · LCTA39/Clark/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kari Roever
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · LCTA39/Clark/MPR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Buchan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle MacKes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle MacKes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle MacKes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
72%
18W–7L · 60.8% of games
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 60% of games
4.0
41.3%
26W–37L · 47.3% of games
6.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 57.8% of games
7.5
70.6%
24W–10L · 55.6% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King