← Search

Mary Lou Winquest

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Valley, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 30W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history54 matches
L
2026-07-17 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Atsuko Christensen championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-15 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Leigh Glesmann
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-13 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Leigh Glesmann championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-12 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Leigh Glesmann championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Spurgeon
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Spurgeon
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-13 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Leigh Glesmann
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-06 · NE/Winquest/65 and over 8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Leigh Glesmann
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-10 · Martin/Winquest · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Atsuko Christensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-30 · Martin/Winquest · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Leigh Glesmann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-06-26 · Martin/Winquest · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Spurgeon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-12 · Martin/Winquest · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Atsuko Christensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 35.7% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 52% of games
8.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 55.8% of games
9.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams