← Search

Angela Torgerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clive, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 94W–67L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history161 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Bruntz/Krause · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mitzi Ecklund
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-10-04 · Bruntz/Krause · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mitzi Ecklund
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-29 · IA/Krause-Bruntz/40&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andi Laine championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · IA/Krause-Bruntz/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andi Laine championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-28 · IA/Krause-Bruntz/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Hansen championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-28 · IA/Krause-Bruntz/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andi Laine championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Dial: LifeTime · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Shortenhaus
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · IA/Bruntz-Krause/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Weyers championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · IA/Bruntz-Krause/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Bruntz championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-02 · Merfeld: DMGCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Stewart
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · IA/Krause-Bruntz/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Corell championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Merfeld: DMGCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Weyers
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60%
21W–14L · 49.8% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 35% of games
4.0
66.1%
41W–21L · 56.8% of games
4.5
50%
6W–6L · 46.3% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 63.2% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
30 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe