← Search

Sarah Corell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clive, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 33W–19L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history52 matches
L
2026-06-27 · IA/Krause-Bruntz/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Torgerson championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · IA/Bruntz-Krause/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Torgerson championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · IA/Bruntz-Krause/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Hansen
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
Default
2026-03-08 · IA/Bruntz-Krause/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Merfeld
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-11 · IA/Bruntz-Krause/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mitzi Ecklund
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-10 · IA/Krause-Bruntz/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitzi Ecklund
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
Default
2025-12-05 · IA/Krause-Bruntz/40&Over4.0W · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitzi Ecklund
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-10 · Merfeld - DMGCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Stewart
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-02-15 · Krause & Bruntz: Genesis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitzi Ecklund
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-01-31 · Krause & Bruntz: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Weyers
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-12-07 · IA/Bruntz/Krause/40&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Torgerson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-09-21 · IA/Bruntz/Krause/40&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Torgerson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.4%
25W–10L · 55.7% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 81.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal