← Search

Dennis McWilliams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Richland Hills, TX
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 22W–15L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history37 matches
W
2024-04-05 · LifeTime Plano Blue/Kemp M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jerry Thomas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-03-24 · High Point/Mitchell M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Possehl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-17 · High Point/Mitchell M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Possehl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
L
2024-02-25 · High Point/Mitchell M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Quon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-02-23 · High Point/Mitchell M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Martin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-02-18 · High Point/Mitchell M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Blair Sanders
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-02-04 · High Point/Mitchell M8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kyle Kaigler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-01-28 · High Point/Mitchell M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leroy Kim
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-26 · High Point/Mitchell M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Mitchell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2021-02-07 · Lakemen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Grisamore
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2021-02-06 · Journey 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rick Boyett
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2021-01-30 · Journey 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lyn Loeffler
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 54.6% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
8.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 52.6% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova