← Search

Michael Stasiak

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richardson, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 64W–55L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history119 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Team 28 Chandlers Landing/Moehler-Stasiak M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frederick Cass
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-10 · Team 28 Chandlers Landing/Moehler-Stasiak M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chuck Menges
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-06-14 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Moehler M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Fitzgerald
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Moehler M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judd Esch
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Moehler M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judd Esch
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-22 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Fitzgerald
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-02-08 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak M8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Waters
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Mefferd
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-18 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak M8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederick Cass
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-02 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Fitzgerald M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Criss
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Fitzgerald M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Haverly
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-05 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Fitzgerald M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Turck
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
57.5%
42W–31L · 51.2% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
44.2%
19W–24L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King