← Search

Matthew Criss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 73W–39L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history112 matches
W
2026-10-10 · Team 28 Chandlers Landing/Moehler-Stasiak M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Tatge
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · Team 28 Chandlers Landing/Moehler-Stasiak M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andres Rodriguez
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-14 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Moehler M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donald Stiles
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Moehler M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donald Stiles
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Moehler M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Edwards
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Moehler M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Wiecker
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Moehler M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Negri
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Fitzgerald M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Stasiak
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-10-19 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Fitzgerald M4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Mefferd
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-09-28 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Fitzgerald M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trent Norris
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-21 · Chandlers Landing/Stasiak-Fitzgerald M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Konjanovski
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-24 · Robert Fitzgerald M8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Race Collins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 63.3% of games
4.0
70.7%
58W–24L · 56.5% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 36.8% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.5% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.6% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Singles
26%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
10%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer