← Search

David Choate

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Garland, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 27W–44L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history71 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Team 7 Spring Park/Legatowicz M4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Vorel
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-12 · Spring Park/Legatowicz-McGowan M4.0 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Apolino Fernandes
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-01 · Spring Park/Walters-McGowan M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Darouse
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-28 · Spring Park/Legatowicz-McGowan M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Vorel
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-22 · Spring Park/Walters-McGowan M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Flores
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-02-21 · Spring Park/Legatowicz-McGowan M4.0 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Vorel
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-15 · Spring Park/Walters-McGowan M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Hauberg
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-12 · Spring Park/Walters-McGowan M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Hauberg
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-08 · Spring Park/Walters-McGowan M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Darouse
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-07 · Spring Park/Legatowicz-McGowan M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Wildberger
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · Spring Park/Walters-McGowan M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Darouse
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-18 · Spring Park/Walters-McGowan M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Darouse
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
42.3%
22W–30L · 49.4% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.5% of games
8.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer