← Search

Brian Stubblefield

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richardson, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 95W–43L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history138 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Team 22 McKinney/Wong-Nair M3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Pronovost
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-09-27 · Team 22 McKinney/Wong-Nair M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Pronovost
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-20 · Team 22 McKinney/Wong-Nair M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alvin Wong
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
Default
2026-05-09 · McKinney/Wong-Llambias M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pradeep Somasundaram
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-04 · McKinney/Wong-Llambias M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Felix Lam
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · McKinney/Wong-Llambias M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Pronovost
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-08 · McKinney/Skinner M7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason McCaslin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · McKinney/Skinner M7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juan Llambias
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-26 · McKinney/Llambias-Wong M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason McCaslin
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · McKinney/Skinner M7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Pronovost
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-15 · McKinney/Skinner M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason McCaslin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-01 · McKinney/Skinner M7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ivan Goridkov
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
72.2%
78W–30L · 58.4% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.5% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 63.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
26 matches
Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert